Review company-device activity through a clear, explained policy.
Work activity and time visibility, introduced with clear employee notice and authorised access.
A manager cannot understand a person’s contribution from an isolated activity score. V360 brings application, website and time information into a controlled review process, with employee access to their own records and permissions around sensitive information.
Review application and website use with active and idle time, using the categories configured for the organisation.
Understand how a working day is distributed without treating a single metric as a performance verdict.
Employees can review their own activity, and managers see their teams through role-based views.
Make the review process explainable to the person whose activity is being considered.
Role-based access, retention settings, an audit trail and a data-access request workflow support controlled handling of activity information.
Define who can review sensitive information and make that responsibility visible.
People teams, managers and IT administrators reviewing activity on company-managed devices.
A signal is useful only with context. V360 brings activity and time information together while allowing employees to review their own records and administrators to control sensitive views.
Explain the purpose, devices, working-time boundaries and information to be collected. Establish employee notice and access responsibilities before rollout.
Choose the modules needed for company computers or enrolled mobile devices. Set roles, retention and screenshot access where those features are enabled.
Compare activity records with team responsibilities and workload. Use the employee view and access-request workflow when a record needs explanation.
The comparison below describes a manual or fragmented process. It makes no claim about another vendor. Use it to identify the handover you want to improve in your own team.
| What to review | Manual or fragmented workflow | The V360 ActiveTrack approach |
|---|---|---|
| Application and website activity | Collect time and application context from separate device records. | Review application and website use with active and idle time, using the categories configured for the organisation. |
| Employee and manager views | Share manually prepared summaries without a consistent employee view. | Employees can review their own activity, and managers see their teams through role-based views. |
| Privacy and access controls | Maintain access and retention responsibilities in informal instructions. | Role-based access, retention settings, an audit trail and a data-access request workflow support controlled handling of activity information. |
The quote depends on user count and the enabled modules. A scoped walkthrough should cover device mix, retention, access policy and rollout responsibilities before deployment.
Request a scoped quoteA few practical details about employee monitoring software and the way V360 ActiveTrack approaches it.
Review application and website use with active and idle time, using the categories configured for the organisation.
Employees can review their own activity, and managers see their teams through role-based views.
Explain the purpose, devices, working-time boundaries and information to be collected. Establish employee notice and access responsibilities before rollout. A representative example is more useful than a full data export at the first enquiry.
The quote depends on user count and the enabled modules. A scoped walkthrough should cover device mix, retention, access policy and rollout responsibilities before deployment.
Yes. The product provides an employee view of their own activity. Managers see their teams through role-based access, while administrators control sensitive information such as screenshots. Establish purpose, notice and retention before rollout.
Understand how a working day is distributed without treating a single metric as a performance verdict. Start with a focused enquiry and a walkthrough of the relevant work.
For Work visibility with employee context built in | V360 ActiveTrack, ask V360 (ActiveTrack) to name the deliverables, inputs, exclusions, timeline and acceptance point in writing. This keeps a broad service description from being mistaken for a final commitment.
The request may name the service but leave the current situation, responsible users, dependencies, timing and commercial boundary unclear.
The brief records the intended outcome, safe reference, itemised scope, open questions, responsibilities, exclusions and next action.
A clear brief helps the team understand the requirement, identify dependencies and keep the first conversation focused.
Share the intended outcome, relevant context, expected timing and any safe reference material that helps explain the requirement.
The team reviews the submitted scope before confirming availability, pricing, dependencies and the appropriate next step.
Yes. Use the enquiry form to describe what you need so the first conversation can focus on fit and open questions.
The first conversation should make the requirement easier to assess and the next step easier to choose.
The team starts with your current situation, intended outcome and any dependencies that can affect the scope.
Deliverables, responsibilities and open questions stay visible before availability or quotation is confirmed.
The response focuses on what can be confirmed now and what information is still needed for a useful decision.
Proof before commitment
Use this review to connect employee monitoring software, fair & transparent with a real requirement, the evidence available today and the result your team needs to evaluate.
Ask V360 (ActiveTrack) for the most relevant current example, workflow or supporting material available for your requirement. Confirm scope and applicability before relying on any claim.
Define the starting point, review the proposed approach and agree how the next decision will be measured.
A useful case study shows the starting situation, chosen scope, delivery conditions and verified outcome. Use that structure when you ask for a relevant example.
Ask for a relevant example →